data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9380e/9380e6a9037f1a941dbf1df5e70eabcad090ae68" alt="Best mac automator workflows 2019"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b62fd/b62fd22f81683e0751fe9c51ef3a758a788c20ff" alt="best mac automator workflows 2019 best mac automator workflows 2019"
Apple's partners can provide IT training, but that's on your company to specifically seek that out. On Apple's business portal they list Cisco as their partner to aid in networking, security, and collaboration solutions, but they primarily focus on integrating iOS devices (e.g., iPhone/iPad). You wouldn't see anywhere near that performance difference in using a MacBook Pro for internal office environment tools since they're no where as resource intensive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3b96/e3b962eb4fdba90851e9bfda0048adbf3dfc0f3b" alt="best mac automator workflows 2019 best mac automator workflows 2019"
Rendering a video in Final Cut takes ~10-20% of the time that it takes to render on a similarly spec'd Windows machine running Adobe Premiere.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f07/d4f0750c6a84cb80ec520fff19ae858a7b33d6e7" alt="best mac automator workflows 2019 best mac automator workflows 2019"/instant-directions-ios-shortcut-5beae235c9e77c00514c16cd.png)
The article even shows that Apple is primarily focusing on pro users in the creative fields. The Pro (Mac) line focuses more on creative, resource intensive cases (e.g., video production, music production, etc.) since the specs/costs are unnecessary for typical tools used in offices. Apple's Pro (Mac) line isn't heavily marketed for full business use.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9380e/9380e6a9037f1a941dbf1df5e70eabcad090ae68" alt="Best mac automator workflows 2019"